The big problem with VIA chipsets, especially the first revisions, where the memory bandwidth. I have my experience that tells me something completely different. VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout in , and at least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs. VIA was great as long as there was no competition to show it’s chipsets weaknesses in performance. Don’t get me wrong. I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of me.
|Date Added:||5 November 2005|
|File Size:||38.54 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of fh6t. Post benchmarks to prove you claims. On the other hand there where more than one chipsets, but I don’t remember how much better BX was compared to the other versions.
Abit VH6T Motherboard Sound card – Questions (with Pictures) – Fixya
These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge. VIA had a bad name because audjo was underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel. It’s true, both from a practical perspective and a legal one. While the older chips were built on the 28 nm process, the KX series will be built on the newer 16 nm process, feature 4 or 8 CPU cores clocked at speeds of up to 3. All you have to back up your claims are words.
I’m sure your experience is caused by a aforementioned shitty cheap no-mane via chipset board. VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout inand at least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs. VIA has no such thing to hedge in on the duopoly. Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 hardware is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years.
It is in fact the slowest of all socket chipsets. But if that’s the reason VIA has been allowed to continue, that puts VIA in a crappy position with regards to potentially putting out truly competitive products.
They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with auvio A versions in both cases. And this is something I remember very well, even after 18 years. Sorry, but I know what I have seen back then.
ABIT VH6T Drivers
It is by no means a fast chipset unless you compare it with socket 7 machines. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel “Gemini Lake” SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors.
The BX was only one thing, and that is stable.
Abit VH6T Motherboard
Every game and testing suite used rendered scores that were equal to or very near identical scores. Check out my threads on Vogons marvin vu6t – I benchmarked most vy6t 1 and socket chipsets last summer. You really don’t have to convince everyone. I don’t have a time machine. You can’t forget that kind of disappointment. I just knew someone will say VIA is Cyrix And I’m not the only one that came to these results – there are similar threads on amibay, vogons and computerhistory forums. It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed.
There was also the CPU cache latency issue with thebut since it was designed to run socket chips with on die cache, it’s not really an issue. We are completely unknown and degrees, experiences and system specs, convince no vj6t. Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor. And I have to prove nothing to you, as you have to prove nothing to me.
Can you prove your findings, or those university degrees are considered proof of everything you post? Adio blast from the past time Batman!
In any case Apollo was much worst than BX.